Employer guide
Employer guide
Suspension is UKVI telling you it believes something is seriously wrong, and giving you one structured chance to prove otherwise. Handled well, licences come back. Handled badly, suspension is the waiting room for revocation.
Suspension is covered by section C9 of the Workers and Temporary Workers sponsor guidance, Part 3 (version 08/26). Four things happen at once. Your entry is removed from the public register of licensed sponsors while the suspension lasts. You cannot assign new certificates of sponsorship, so recruitment of sponsored workers stops immediately. Your existing sponsored workers are not affected: their permission continues and they carry on working, unless the matter later ends in revocation. And every sponsor duty continues to apply to you in full, which surprises employers who assume a suspended licence means a suspended rulebook.
That last point matters more than it appears. UKVI watches how a sponsor behaves during suspension. Continuing to report on time, keep records properly and pay correctly through the suspension period is itself evidence that the failures alleged in the letter are not how the organisation normally operates.
Most suspensions follow a compliance visit, announced or unannounced, or a paper review triggered by something UKVI noticed: a pattern in your reporting, intelligence from another agency, or a worker's own application. The recurring themes are late or missing reports of worker changes, worker files that do not meet the Appendix D record keeping requirements, right to work checks done by the wrong method or not evidenced, salary that slipped below the required rate in individual pay periods, roles that no longer match the certificate of sponsorship they were assigned under, and clauses recouping sponsorship costs from workers, which carry a presumption of revocation.
Underneath nearly all of them sits one principle: UKVI treats a duty you cannot evidence as a duty you did not meet. A right to work check that was done but not properly recorded is, for enforcement purposes, a check that was not done. Sponsors are routinely expected to produce specified documents within five working days, and on a visit, on the day. If your response to the suspension letter is going to succeed, it succeeds on documents, not assurances.
The letter sets out the reasons for suspension, or initial reasons where UKVI is suspending pending a fuller investigation, in which case it will tell you an investigation is under way. It invites your written response and sets the deadline for it, commonly 20 working days from the date of the letter. Diarise the deadline on day one and treat it as fixed: extensions are exceptional, not routine.
Read the allegations as a pleading, because that is how UKVI will read your reply. Every numbered concern needs an answer. An impressive response to eight allegations that ignores the ninth invites revocation on the ninth.
Take each concern in turn and attach the contemporaneous evidence that answers it: SMS confirmations, dated worker files, payroll runs, check outputs. Where the evidence exists, the allegation usually dissolves.
Where UKVI is right, say so. A candid admission, an explanation of how it happened and proof it has been fixed is far stronger than a strained defence of the indefensible, and credibility on the weak points buys credibility on the strong ones.
A remediation plan is only persuasive once it has already happened: the corrected contracts signed, the new reporting procedure in operation, the retrained staff named, the back payments made. Attach the proof of each step, dated.
Backdated or rebuilt paperwork is the single fastest route from a recoverable suspension to revocation, and it raises questions that outlast the licence. A gap explained honestly can be forgiven. A record invented to fill it cannot.
UKVI accepts your response and restores the licence with an A rating. Your register entry returns and you can assign certificates again. Expect closer attention afterwards; keep the standards that got the licence back.
UKVI reinstates the licence but downgrades it, with a time limited action plan you must complete and pay for. B rated sponsors cannot assign new certificates for out of country recruits until the A rating is restored.
UKVI is not satisfied and revokes the licence, with everything that follows for the business and its sponsored workers. There is no right of appeal, which is why the response at suspension stage carries so much weight.
Because no statutory appeal exists, the written response to the suspension letter is, in practice, your trial. It deserves the same rigour as litigation: a full defence, properly evidenced, professionally assembled. If it fails, the remaining routes are far narrower; the challenge guide explains them.
Lawyery acts for sponsors at every stage of enforcement, from the first letter to judicial review. Fixed fees, direct access to the solicitor doing the work, and a response built on evidence.
Book an urgent consultation